Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Exhaust tube size
Collapse
X
-
j/c, what would the effects of a flapper setup similar to the throttle body do to the torque(so as you depressed the gas, it opened more)? it would restrict as needed wouldn't it? as long as it flowed enough fully closed for the engine to run.
-
When the catcon on my 3.9 Dakota plugged up, it would come off the line like it's butt was on fire (a definite improvement from normal). At approx 2000 rpm it would fall flat on it's face. Replacing the catcon (under warranty) solved the rpm issue. Also lost the great low end torque.
Jerry
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lancerevo View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Each to their own, on a stock B3, I'd go 1 5/8 and just try to make turns as smooth and non-restrictive as possible. Frankly big diameter exhaust is only useful if you are running high rpms and trying to get last ounce of power out of the thing such as racing. The head has to be ported and fuel system set up for high flow. For daily driver its just not needed. Same thing with people using huge carburetors, pointless unless the engine can use that much flow, most stock engines cant, especially at normal speeds. Best thing on a stock B3 would be to make sure it has clean cat and try to make turns around gas tank in back as smooth and free flowing as possible. I know my exhaust back there has kink from when I hit big rock and knocked muffler off. I unbent it but still a restriction there that needs to be gotten rid of. I notice power decreasing rapidly at higher rpm.
The whole setup has to be looked at as a system. A change in one component requires changes all around to compensate.Last edited by Banana Bonanza; 08-27-2009, 01:48 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GenevaDirt View Postif it does not need the backpressure then why does it matter what size pipes and muffler you put on it? I am not trying to argue, I am trying to learn. I put a bigger exhaust and cherry bombs on my car and the low end torque was gone along with what little passing ability these cars have, not to mention my gas milage dropped off. Once I put it back to stock exhaust the cars pep was back and so was my gas milage. If it is not back pressure that causes this then what is it?
Leave a comment:
-
ok, so bottom line. 2" from the exhaust manifold+cat+regular muffler(I dont like too much noise) is the right way??
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by skeeters_keeper View Post^funky, thats what I did, have you seen my latest "skeeter update thread"? i have a custom 2 1/8" DP + exhaust, only thing to disrupt flow is a cat (nececary for inspection).
Leave a comment:
-
Agreeing with multiple people with different arguments is messy, but its the case here. I would just set aside the funds to upgrade the system for the larger engine and leave it stock until i was ready for the swap. if you are just itching for change, just go 2". that is the size of plenty of 1.8 liter engines out there and they fun fine just like that. you will be happier in the long run not having to buy things twice.
Leave a comment:
-
also with too large a primary (or in our case, down pipe) the scavenging effect can be TOO great and actually suck out some fuel charge before it's used. effectively reducing the engine's displacement.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: