I've always been curious why Ralph Nader's broadside killing the Corvair over issues related to their original swing axle rear suspension, never had much bleedover with either Volkswagens or other very similar swing axle automobiles?
No one was looking for a rear engine Pontiac Tempest with swing axles, of course; though even that car's front engine, rear swing trans-axle version with the DeLorean flexible drive train from the mid '60s, must've exhibited some of the less than ideal characteristics of a swing axle rear drive suspension-no? Including increasingly worse angle of contact with road surfaces, as the axles flexed more radically; along with more complex issues, related to that and/or other similar phenomena...particularly resulting in the tendency towards unsafe driving characteristics.
A person would've imagined that during the time the Corvair was under assault, the then hugely popular Volkswagen would've attracted attention for a near identical mechanism including the rear engine; though I've never seen any discussion comparing the two, though sometimes even Porches have been objects of rational criticism, due to the pendulum like effect of a behind the rear axle motor, and the extreme weight bias that creates whether swing axle or otherwise.
Could there've been any sort of corporate collusion, able to so effectively shield VW; while leaving General Motors so obviously vulnerable? Or, were perhaps the specifics involved, just enough better driving characteristics on VWs than Corvairs; to make the latter that much more worthy of censure?
I more or less lived out of a '66 VW "square-back" sedan, the Type III station wagon-designed for the American market after the war, which became known amongst mechanics as "Hitler's Revenge;"* for the dozen years we were together from '82-'94: And also had friends also dependent upon a Volkswagen during some of the times when those were most popular as durable and practical flotsam/jetsam of a hugely successful and very long production run; so can appreciate perhaps much of the martial characteristics, which also made those vehicles great for people with significant budget and/or other serious enough issues.
Thinking now with much imagination of a more successful Corvair, that could've become successor to the Jeep; rather than the gargantuan Hummer? Doubtless, the world hasn't needed any such a successor to a VW's specific legacy...a "jack of all" proclivities, so to speak.
*The oil coolers were mounted ninety degrees from those in the bugs or buses, horizontal rather than vertical; ending up directly above the #3 cylinder, causing overheating and failure far more than with other VWs-to give a flat floor behind the rear seats, or flat trunk space in the fastbacks and notchbacks. An effective solution, was to relocate an appropriate aftermarket oil cooler; typically in the left rear fender, behind the air intake.
No one was looking for a rear engine Pontiac Tempest with swing axles, of course; though even that car's front engine, rear swing trans-axle version with the DeLorean flexible drive train from the mid '60s, must've exhibited some of the less than ideal characteristics of a swing axle rear drive suspension-no? Including increasingly worse angle of contact with road surfaces, as the axles flexed more radically; along with more complex issues, related to that and/or other similar phenomena...particularly resulting in the tendency towards unsafe driving characteristics.
A person would've imagined that during the time the Corvair was under assault, the then hugely popular Volkswagen would've attracted attention for a near identical mechanism including the rear engine; though I've never seen any discussion comparing the two, though sometimes even Porches have been objects of rational criticism, due to the pendulum like effect of a behind the rear axle motor, and the extreme weight bias that creates whether swing axle or otherwise.
Could there've been any sort of corporate collusion, able to so effectively shield VW; while leaving General Motors so obviously vulnerable? Or, were perhaps the specifics involved, just enough better driving characteristics on VWs than Corvairs; to make the latter that much more worthy of censure?
I more or less lived out of a '66 VW "square-back" sedan, the Type III station wagon-designed for the American market after the war, which became known amongst mechanics as "Hitler's Revenge;"* for the dozen years we were together from '82-'94: And also had friends also dependent upon a Volkswagen during some of the times when those were most popular as durable and practical flotsam/jetsam of a hugely successful and very long production run; so can appreciate perhaps much of the martial characteristics, which also made those vehicles great for people with significant budget and/or other serious enough issues.
Thinking now with much imagination of a more successful Corvair, that could've become successor to the Jeep; rather than the gargantuan Hummer? Doubtless, the world hasn't needed any such a successor to a VW's specific legacy...a "jack of all" proclivities, so to speak.
*The oil coolers were mounted ninety degrees from those in the bugs or buses, horizontal rather than vertical; ending up directly above the #3 cylinder, causing overheating and failure far more than with other VWs-to give a flat floor behind the rear seats, or flat trunk space in the fastbacks and notchbacks. An effective solution, was to relocate an appropriate aftermarket oil cooler; typically in the left rear fender, behind the air intake.
Comment