I think its dumb to have to check into the FF.com website every time there a notification is sent about a response to threads or posts, where a person wants to be informed of other posts to the same thread.
The way the system is currently set up, a person receives no notifications after one has been sent, until they check into the web site.
This seems to mean that any other places I'd like notifications about are missed until I respond to the last notification sent me.
I'm not fond of being addicted to anything, such as having to constantly monitor my emails sent from this website; particularly for superfluous reasons.
I'd guess this is some facet of the website, administrators are forced to comply with; who've reasoned this as the lessor of evils, since the problem is obvious enough?
Unfortunately the general society is so driven by consumer exploitation that many systems are set up to make unavoidable, victimization by inconvenience.
Anything not contributing to further commodification of everyone else, to contribute to the greatest possible profit of those who are the richest.
Making futile especially, lives of those in the overwhelming majority, who all over the planet live in wretched poverty.
Well, logic taken to the end; but, are my initial point, and conclusions in between about that, reasonable?
The way the system is currently set up, a person receives no notifications after one has been sent, until they check into the web site.
This seems to mean that any other places I'd like notifications about are missed until I respond to the last notification sent me.
I'm not fond of being addicted to anything, such as having to constantly monitor my emails sent from this website; particularly for superfluous reasons.
I'd guess this is some facet of the website, administrators are forced to comply with; who've reasoned this as the lessor of evils, since the problem is obvious enough?
Unfortunately the general society is so driven by consumer exploitation that many systems are set up to make unavoidable, victimization by inconvenience.
Anything not contributing to further commodification of everyone else, to contribute to the greatest possible profit of those who are the richest.
Making futile especially, lives of those in the overwhelming majority, who all over the planet live in wretched poverty.
Well, logic taken to the end; but, are my initial point, and conclusions in between about that, reasonable?
Comment