Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DAE Max MPG CAMSHAFT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sketchman
    replied
    Can you explain what kind of torque curve this is made for? Flatter? Low rev biased? I know you said the customer reported no loss in power, but how high is he/she revving it?

    I'm not trying to be a pain. Just want to know whether to go with this one or one of your performance grinds. For instance, I want to do a backyard ECOboost type thing. So, I'm looking at MILD porting, eventually flat top pistons, and a small turbo. Would you recommend this cam or a mild one of your boost cams?

    Leave a comment:


  • FestYboy
    replied
    Originally posted by mattdickmeyer View Post
    Shipped this morning!
    yeah i know!!! just so excited :geeking out: :highly_amused:nthego:
    Last edited by FestYboy; 06-17-2013, 11:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie1717
    replied
    Pretty good investment for those looking for better mpgs!

    Scenario 1:
    30mpg stock, +7mpg with upgrade, $180 cost, $3.65 gal
    Payback= 21 fill-ups or 6,300 miles

    Scenario 2:
    40mpg Stock, +7mpg, $180 cost, $3.65 Gal
    Payback= 28 fill-ups or 11,200 miles

    These are estimates (hopefully my math is right ), but gives you a good idea of the value of this upgrade.
    Last edited by Charlie1717; 06-17-2013, 11:27 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mattdickmeyer
    replied
    Can be done!

    Leave a comment:


  • blkfordsedan
    replied
    Nice job Matt! Hmmm....what about a max MPG grind on an Aspire roller?

    Leave a comment:


  • mattdickmeyer
    replied
    Shipped this morning!

    Leave a comment:


  • FestYboy
    replied
    sweetness.

    BTW can't wait to get my stage 2 cam/springs/FPR in!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • mattdickmeyer
    replied
    No valve spring upgrade needed.Developed cam to save purchaser money by not needing costly extras , with much thought towards intake and exhaust cycles and increasing drivability

    Leave a comment:


  • Movin
    replied
    Focusing on less residuals left in the combustion chamber to allow ignition of a leaner mix ? Is the lift a hair more than stock, enough to need extra valve spring room?

    Leave a comment:


  • mattdickmeyer
    replied
    Cam cost remains the same as our performance cams ,$ 180.00. I would expect much greater gain (in mpg) with EFI , cam is designed for 87 octane. Customer reported no major loss of power,MPG was his main objective. Cam will allow leaner AFR, and higher compression ratio on 87 octane with no ping.

    Leave a comment:


  • David88
    replied
    Yes, any more details? I do WOT on highway to maintain speed on some hills now. I wonder how noticeable is the compromise in performance? I might throw one in my automatic. I like the idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • rmoltis
    replied
    Awesome!!!
    I bet a lot of people would love enhanced mileage.
    So this is designed to give better part throttle response.
    I really love the idea of this cam and it looks like the one I would "lean" towards.
    My question is.
    With the longtube header back exhaust, intake and fpr installed would the cam profile still be effective.
    Or would I be better off with one of the other grinds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaronbrook37
    replied
    Any other recommended pre-requisite mods to maximize the performance of this camshaft? Very interested for sure price pending of course!

    Leave a comment:


  • Flyin4stroke
    replied
    What octane fuel?

    Leave a comment:


  • Prafeston
    replied
    Cool! How much?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X