Tweet
Torque
-
'93 BP-T 57trim TO4E - Coilovers - 13x7 steelies - 175/60 - 48k mi
-
Silly. I like the kool-aid guy.
-
LMAO!!!! that was awesome
that owl looks so funny 
Mike, AKA the sasquatch
1990 LX, bp+T/g25mr, 9psi dynoed at 194HP, turbonetics t3/to4e 57trim, haltech E6X standalone, 550cc injectors, turbosmart wastegate, synapse BOV, walbro 255 fuel pump, aeromotive FPR, AEM wideband, 3 inch exhaust, huge FMIC, 9LB flywheel, 6 puck clutch and way more parts that im forgetting i installed lol...Comment
-
Its amazing what an 8000 rpm clutch drop can do
-Scott
Aqua 93 L
Razor Red 09 F-150 XLT
White 06 Ford Escape XLTComment
-
WOW, just imagine what that Honda would do with a small block Ford swap! It would probably flip over backwards! Or, the rear end would explode. LOL
(just gettin' back for slammin' Mustangs in a different thread!)Brian
93L - 5SP, FMS springs, 323 alloys, 1st gen B6, ported head & intake, FMS cam, ported exhaust manifold w/2-1/4" head pipe.
04 Mustang GT, 5SP, CAI, TFS plenum, 70mm TB, catted X, Pypes 304SS cat-back, Hurst Billet+ shifter, SCT/Bama tuned....4.10's & cams coming soon
62 Galaxie 2D sedan project- 428, 3x2V, 4SP, 3.89TLOC
1 wife, 2 kids, 9 dogs, 4 cats......
Not enough time or money for any of themComment
-
Lol, and the Honda doesn't even flex like the MustangComment
-
:toothy7::toothy7:Originally posted by blkfordsedan View Post'93 BP-T 57trim TO4E - Coilovers - 13x7 steelies - 175/60 - 48k mi
Comment
-
Forgot to add it made a low 9 pass!!!'93 BP-T 57trim TO4E - Coilovers - 13x7 steelies - 175/60 - 48k mi
Comment
-
awesome, and the funny part is that the s2000 probably still handles pretty well. i would thing a 9 sec junkstang wouldn`t handly for crap, their rear ends kick out with any sudden movement lol.Comment
-
See this anyone? 1000hp TT Gallardo running 9.5....
Edit: Not enough torque for two front wheel lift, but not far from it either.
Comment
-
I'd take the 'Stang any day...and the Honda is NOT pulling the wheels as hard as the 'Stang....so NO the honda isn't doing it. And yes, I have driven an S2000, don't think it will out corner my Comp Prep SVO...1986 Comp Prep SVO Mustang(1 of 83) Four cylinder turbo! (Think first Fox body "R" model!)
1995 F-150 Extra Cab and it was free!
1991 Festiva L, Surf Blue with A/C
1995 Jeep Cherokee 2wd 5 speed 4.0 and it was free!
1993 Aqua Festiva and it was cheap!
1994 Brake Swap and it was cheap!
1969 Ford F100 Big Block Ranger and it was free! (coming 2/12)Comment
-
The caption on the mustang pic was originally supposed to be TORQUE: It's not about lifting the wheels, it's about twisting the frame!89' Maroon and black Festiva LX with a sunroof. :alien:Comment
-
Pulling the front wheels is more of an issue of traction . Yes it takes some energy to do it but I have seen some 14 second cars pull ( jerk) the front pretty highmoney pit
No spitters were I work, you swallow it all. The Company feels if you already have it in your mouth why waste it.Comment
-
I'll say it once and I'll say it again: That picture of the Mustang really shows the rigidity of newer Ford RWDs.Current cars:
1993 Ford Festiva 5-Speed - Festiclese III - Cousin of the Banhammer - "The Jalopnik Car"
1984 Toyota Cressida - 2JZGE Swap, Turbocharged.
2013 Mazda Mazda2 - Exhaust and Wheels (the daily)
2002 Toyota Tundra - V6/Auto/2WD - The Tow Vehicle.Comment
-
Would have been better if it was a supra or any other rwd import rather than a S2000. S200's were famous for being high strung and lacking torque. S2000's only make 163 ft/lbs of torque from the factory and thats at 7000rpm.Comment
Comment