Tom, I believe Lady Blasters is an automatic. That could account for the loss you are thinking about.
Jerry
Team Lightning
Owner of Team Lightning
90 L "Peewee" B6D. Bought new May 16,1990
92 L Thunder BP G5M-R Turbo B6T electronics. Jan 2016 FOTM winner SOLD
93 L Lightning. BP
Not a user of drugs or alcohol, Just addicted to Festiva's
I have a feeling the numbers are a bit high but a good comparison between the cars for sure!
Well next time we will just use a Dynojet and really show some inflated numbers.
Do the research and check out the DynoDynamics specs vs Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet.
Festiva/Mazda genetic splicing researcher B6T / G25MR for 5+ years and counting.
187.7 WHP @ 5500 RPM
Actually those numbers should be pretty close. A Dyno Dynamics is comparable to a Mustang dyno which typically reads lower because it's what the car is actually putting to the ground and it loads the car as if it were on the street. Even one of the guys at SFM called the DD the "heartbreaker" LOL. The numbers would have been bigger if we had ran them on a Dynojet.
Jack - You can play with the correction factor on all dynos but Dynojets tend to be the easiest to inflate. On this dyno the correction factor was 1.175. If they want to make a number that looks like a Dynojet value they use 1.250
Tom - Not sure what the deal was with Angie's B6. I thought it was low as well, but it's a pretty well worn auto and we also know the electronics have been an issue on her car. We tried a different VAF on the car last night night and it didn't like it and the ECU is suspect as well.
Good to see such a wide variety of tests from one dyno. Great job guys. The automatic transmissions can be expected to put down less hp. Dyno Dynamix meters are usually pretty accurate, however I'm noticing a strange trend here. around 3400 RPM, all the graphs have a strange TQ dip. This may be an issue with the load on the dyno. Also, for comparison sake, it's best to get all the charts with the same resolution. The scales are different for each car here and that makes comparison more difficult. If the resolution were the same then that 3400ish rpm deviation would look nearly identical on every chart if my theory is correct. This looks like an equipment error. Nobody wants a dip in TQ right there, so this would be a focus of mine as a tuner, but I don't think it's in the cars themselves.
Also, in the future, try to get the A/F on the same graph and include the page that gives peak values. Looking forward to more of this!
Driving for me is neither a right nor a privilege. Driving is my passion, as it was for the people who invented the automobile, the people who paved the first roads and the people who continue to improve the automobile. Please respect this passion.
As far as the TQ dip, I did notice that and also noticed the cars were bogging some right after he would start the test and give it the throttle and it took them a little to pick up. I was thinking this was where the dip may have came from. But 3400 does seem a little high for that since the boosted cars were passed the "bog" by that RPM. He did run AFR on the turbo cars but it wasn't on the graph. I'm more accustomed to seeing Mustang Dyno graphs and I think they could do a little better with the info on the graph and the line colors. But, I have seen the shops around here change the resolution from car to car. I'm thinking they do this because most people are only concerned with what their car makes and not the next guys LOL.
We'll have to inquire about this on the next trip!
Mods = Minor head work, pocket porting and exhaust runners.
don't feel bad, Scrappy came up with the same numbers in 4th (stock cam, Full port job on the head, FMS headers and 2.25" exhaust, stock carb) when i ran it on the dyno at NTI.
Trees aren't kind to me...
currently: 2 88Ls (Scrappy and Jersey), 88LX, 90L(Pepe), 91L, 91GL (Skippy) 93 GL Sport (the Mighty Favakk), 94 (Bruce) & 95 Aspire SEs, 97 Aspire (The Joker),
94 Justy 4WD, 87 Fiero GT, plus 2 parts cars. That's my fleet.
IIRC it was a mustang... large known mass roller, car was lifted to run on the unit, it's been 8 years, i'll have to hunt hard to find the sheet. i know that i ran out of carb past 5300 and i had the timing pulled back to 8 from the 12 that i usually ran (87 oct tune).
Trees aren't kind to me...
currently: 2 88Ls (Scrappy and Jersey), 88LX, 90L(Pepe), 91L, 91GL (Skippy) 93 GL Sport (the Mighty Favakk), 94 (Bruce) & 95 Aspire SEs, 97 Aspire (The Joker),
94 Justy 4WD, 87 Fiero GT, plus 2 parts cars. That's my fleet.
Comment