Yesterday I took my car to the same shop which recently changed the water pump, alternator, timing belt, alternator belt and the two oil seals on the crank and cam shafts behind the timing belt: Where they also replaced the valve cover gasket at the same time, which seemed to be leaking too.
The reason I returned the car to them was because the alternator belt was squealing at low idle speeds; when I had to goose the gas pedal a little to make the engine idle faster, to keep the motor from dying. They tightened the belt at no charge, which seems to've solved the belt squealing problem.
Before the work described was done, the motor had been using increasing amounts of oil; and there was a lot of oil in the area of the timing belt cover, and all over the alternator too-which probably contributed to an early failure of the alternator. Since having the recent work done, however; the oil consumption has seemed to increase rather than decrease. I'd wanted to monitor this a little more, to make sure my impressions were accurate, before trying to see what was happening; though since I had the car in the shop, I asked them to see if they had an opinion.
What I was told is the motor is suffering "blow by" I've heard of with other older cars; though hadn't considered as likely in my Festiva, before now. Though I've lately noticed evidence of a little smoke if the motor has been running awhile and is hot, when I remove the oil fill cap on the top of the valve cover; I haven't noticed that there seems a lot or any pressure being released inside the crankcase, when the fill cap is off while the motor is running. There is a lot of oil on the outside of the motor in the area of the distributor, I've noticed for some time. I replaced the distributor not long after the work the shop did, because oil inside of the distributor cap, suggesting the distributor was worn enough a new one was needed.
The person at the shop who told me "blow by" is the reason for the car's oil consumption which makes the crankcase leak; tried to explain to me what "blow by" is, I'd heard of before and felt I sort of understood, beforehand. Though the more I try to understand what he told me, the less I feel I understand that. All I'm really sure of, is that there is supposed to be pressure inside the crankcase; and that this is a sign of the motor wearing out.
As one might guess, this isn't welcome news; with the motor nearing 180,000 miles I've had since 85,000 miles, when purchased June of '99. The spark plugs have always looked excellent when I change those, with no sign of oil in the combustion chamber; and the same even, slightly tan white dusty color, and not too much deterioration of the electrodes. The gap typically widens a little over time, I'd re-gap once during the course of the life of a set of plugs before finally changing those; though other than that I've done nothing else to the plugs, nor have noticed anything unusual about them.
There was a connecting rod and probably a piston replaced the winter/spring of 2002; when a connecting rod was bent and for awhile I'd thought I'd lose the car, I had to leave with someone who managed to fix the motor for me. Though since the plugs all look the same when being changed, this makes me feel that work was well done; and nothing is out of the ordinary with that particular cylinder.
This has always made me feel confident that the general condition of the motor is excellent; which the car's exceptionally good gas mileage and generally good running, also help to give the same impression. Though now I'm faced with the idea the motor is in some sort of an advanced stage of deterioration. I'm wondering if the shop could somehow be mistaken; or if not, I need to know more about what "blow by" is, and what sort of life is left to the motor now?
I'm having a hard time figuring out how, if the piston rings are in good enough condition there is no oil in the combustion chambers; why there is pressure from combustion, getting into the crankcase and causing that to leak?
The shop's inspection also revealed oil leaking from the seal around the oil pan; and since I used the Auto-Rx treatment at about 130,000 miles, this has been the reason I've thought I'm having oil leak problems, others at this website also agree could be the case. [http://www.auto-rx.com/ The same sort of problem, many years ago with cars built before there were high detergent oils, being switched to those high detergent oils from the older oil; which could ruin a motor, by all the crud which the high detergent oils released. The person at the shop also told me that my use of synthetic oil, would typically create more leakage than with normal oil; if there were places that oil might leak.
I've driven a lot of highway miles with the Festiva, and feel driving to Seattle and back often over 75 mph to keep up with traffic, is hard on the motor; compared to loafing along around 65 or a little less-which also gives better gas mileage. One thing I noticed about this Festiva's motor, which happened before I got the car; is the timing belt cover is heat distorted, I've never seen on other Festivas. Since the cars are known as running cool, and the car's radiator fan didn't work when purchased; this suggests something severe may've happened to the motor before my purchase.
Typically the car's radiator cooling fan hasn't worked, since the thermostat controlling the fan is dysfunctional; and the past few years the car seems to generally run hotter than when first purchased: This could be simply that my driving situations are different; with more high speed freeway miles, than open country roads at slower speeds. For the first few years I had the Festiva, I didn't even notice the fan didn't work.
The person selling the car to me, the original owner who was a jet helicopter mechanic in the Coast Guard, hasn't seemed to be entirely honest or trustworthy either. Since a recent brake job he'd done was one selling point, and I later had a brake malfunction causing a minor accident; where the mechanic at the Ford dealership I took the car to after the malfunction, pointed out lack of lubrication of the pin one of the front calipers has to float on to center the caliper on the rotor, is what caused the malfunction. The whole inside of the engine compartment had apparently been detailed extensively also, to give the impression of a motor and car in better general condition than was actually the case.
He also tried to discourage me from changing the timing belt; as if those could go on indefinitely without need of replacement, so like he was trying to encourage someone he presumed a fool, to be even more foolish. Once I'd exhibited a generally good mechanical knowledge in the process of buying the car I paid $2500 for, this seemed to make him considerably nervous. His wife was so generally positive and friendly, this overcame any negative feelings I might've had for the Coast Guard guy. I also noticed their teenage son seemed to perhaps regard me with some hostility; so I've wondered if their selling the car may've been some sort of discipline of him, and/or that he may've been who actually did the sloppy brake job?
Being what I guess many might call a "hippy" too, makes me feel a little insecure or paranoiac dealing with strangers; for the potential of any prejudices involved. Though that adage I've seen in Latin since so ancient; about "the buyer being beware" is certainly worth thinking through. Not too many people selling something they never expect to see again, to someone they also don't plan on having anything more to do with; are likely to want to give a negative impression about themselves, or about what they are trying to sell.
The reason I returned the car to them was because the alternator belt was squealing at low idle speeds; when I had to goose the gas pedal a little to make the engine idle faster, to keep the motor from dying. They tightened the belt at no charge, which seems to've solved the belt squealing problem.
Before the work described was done, the motor had been using increasing amounts of oil; and there was a lot of oil in the area of the timing belt cover, and all over the alternator too-which probably contributed to an early failure of the alternator. Since having the recent work done, however; the oil consumption has seemed to increase rather than decrease. I'd wanted to monitor this a little more, to make sure my impressions were accurate, before trying to see what was happening; though since I had the car in the shop, I asked them to see if they had an opinion.
What I was told is the motor is suffering "blow by" I've heard of with other older cars; though hadn't considered as likely in my Festiva, before now. Though I've lately noticed evidence of a little smoke if the motor has been running awhile and is hot, when I remove the oil fill cap on the top of the valve cover; I haven't noticed that there seems a lot or any pressure being released inside the crankcase, when the fill cap is off while the motor is running. There is a lot of oil on the outside of the motor in the area of the distributor, I've noticed for some time. I replaced the distributor not long after the work the shop did, because oil inside of the distributor cap, suggesting the distributor was worn enough a new one was needed.
The person at the shop who told me "blow by" is the reason for the car's oil consumption which makes the crankcase leak; tried to explain to me what "blow by" is, I'd heard of before and felt I sort of understood, beforehand. Though the more I try to understand what he told me, the less I feel I understand that. All I'm really sure of, is that there is supposed to be pressure inside the crankcase; and that this is a sign of the motor wearing out.
As one might guess, this isn't welcome news; with the motor nearing 180,000 miles I've had since 85,000 miles, when purchased June of '99. The spark plugs have always looked excellent when I change those, with no sign of oil in the combustion chamber; and the same even, slightly tan white dusty color, and not too much deterioration of the electrodes. The gap typically widens a little over time, I'd re-gap once during the course of the life of a set of plugs before finally changing those; though other than that I've done nothing else to the plugs, nor have noticed anything unusual about them.
There was a connecting rod and probably a piston replaced the winter/spring of 2002; when a connecting rod was bent and for awhile I'd thought I'd lose the car, I had to leave with someone who managed to fix the motor for me. Though since the plugs all look the same when being changed, this makes me feel that work was well done; and nothing is out of the ordinary with that particular cylinder.
This has always made me feel confident that the general condition of the motor is excellent; which the car's exceptionally good gas mileage and generally good running, also help to give the same impression. Though now I'm faced with the idea the motor is in some sort of an advanced stage of deterioration. I'm wondering if the shop could somehow be mistaken; or if not, I need to know more about what "blow by" is, and what sort of life is left to the motor now?
I'm having a hard time figuring out how, if the piston rings are in good enough condition there is no oil in the combustion chambers; why there is pressure from combustion, getting into the crankcase and causing that to leak?
The shop's inspection also revealed oil leaking from the seal around the oil pan; and since I used the Auto-Rx treatment at about 130,000 miles, this has been the reason I've thought I'm having oil leak problems, others at this website also agree could be the case. [http://www.auto-rx.com/ The same sort of problem, many years ago with cars built before there were high detergent oils, being switched to those high detergent oils from the older oil; which could ruin a motor, by all the crud which the high detergent oils released. The person at the shop also told me that my use of synthetic oil, would typically create more leakage than with normal oil; if there were places that oil might leak.
I've driven a lot of highway miles with the Festiva, and feel driving to Seattle and back often over 75 mph to keep up with traffic, is hard on the motor; compared to loafing along around 65 or a little less-which also gives better gas mileage. One thing I noticed about this Festiva's motor, which happened before I got the car; is the timing belt cover is heat distorted, I've never seen on other Festivas. Since the cars are known as running cool, and the car's radiator fan didn't work when purchased; this suggests something severe may've happened to the motor before my purchase.
Typically the car's radiator cooling fan hasn't worked, since the thermostat controlling the fan is dysfunctional; and the past few years the car seems to generally run hotter than when first purchased: This could be simply that my driving situations are different; with more high speed freeway miles, than open country roads at slower speeds. For the first few years I had the Festiva, I didn't even notice the fan didn't work.
The person selling the car to me, the original owner who was a jet helicopter mechanic in the Coast Guard, hasn't seemed to be entirely honest or trustworthy either. Since a recent brake job he'd done was one selling point, and I later had a brake malfunction causing a minor accident; where the mechanic at the Ford dealership I took the car to after the malfunction, pointed out lack of lubrication of the pin one of the front calipers has to float on to center the caliper on the rotor, is what caused the malfunction. The whole inside of the engine compartment had apparently been detailed extensively also, to give the impression of a motor and car in better general condition than was actually the case.
He also tried to discourage me from changing the timing belt; as if those could go on indefinitely without need of replacement, so like he was trying to encourage someone he presumed a fool, to be even more foolish. Once I'd exhibited a generally good mechanical knowledge in the process of buying the car I paid $2500 for, this seemed to make him considerably nervous. His wife was so generally positive and friendly, this overcame any negative feelings I might've had for the Coast Guard guy. I also noticed their teenage son seemed to perhaps regard me with some hostility; so I've wondered if their selling the car may've been some sort of discipline of him, and/or that he may've been who actually did the sloppy brake job?
Being what I guess many might call a "hippy" too, makes me feel a little insecure or paranoiac dealing with strangers; for the potential of any prejudices involved. Though that adage I've seen in Latin since so ancient; about "the buyer being beware" is certainly worth thinking through. Not too many people selling something they never expect to see again, to someone they also don't plan on having anything more to do with; are likely to want to give a negative impression about themselves, or about what they are trying to sell.
Comment