Turbo Encabulator

[FestYboy]

the fact that you took the time to type this and make it sound plausible defies my logic circuits.

[MONSOON]

Although your statement does indeed exude veracity, one must remain cognizant of the increaseometric ratio of flux reposnance normal to the encabulator(s) unisurface manifold(s), so as to not exceed the local para-monoelastic modulus. Else it's a case of potentially shredded influx glytroskinators. And they're not cheap to replace.

Resublimation has been endemically demonstrated, at least with respect to the well-known thiotimoline monotonic exsponsivity derivative-quotient curves, to have exacerbated the tripulsifier subquark depolarization rate, at both idle and WOT conditions. I really wouldn't recommend exceeding the textbook 6.23e+04 wobulations/cubic-centimeter rate as would likely occur with multiple dendritic chrystals.

That's just my 02 cents worth though.

www.dictionary.com helped me read this. I still dont understand what the hell you typed. But it helped me read it.

[NovaSS]

they stole the patent from rockwell international..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5125780462773187994#

[TominMO]

the fact that you took the time to type this and make it sound plausible defies my logic circuits.

What do you mean, SOUND plausible?

[FestYboy]

what do you mean, sound plausible?

baahahha

[TominMO]

baahahha

Hey buddy, encabulate this! :-)

[sam.1956]

www.dictionary.com helped me read this. I still dont understand what the hell you typed. But it helped me read it.

Ha ha! You think YOU didn't understand it... you shoulda been on THIS end of the keyboard!

[fastivaca]

Although your statement does indeed exude veracity, one must remain cognizant of the increaseometric ratio of flux reposnance normal to the encabulator(s) unisurface manifold(s), so as to not exceed the local para-monoelastic modulus. Else it's a case of potentially shredded influx glytroskinators. And they're not cheap to replace.

The latest issue of Scientific Mulitverse (stardate 795.633) has an article extolling the benefits of a local para-trielastic modulus. The writer is quite confident that the previous conflicts between the para-monoelastic modulus and influx glytroskinators are all but eliminated.

Hope that helps!

[sam.1956]

^^Had I but known! Thanks so much for this eye-opening article! I hadn't even considered the potential application of the para-trielastic modulus on the monosurface manifold. How could I have missed something this obvious?! DOH!!

So now we can proceed post-haste with the multi-encabulator upgrade! WOOOO HOOOO!!!

[TominMO]

The latest issue of Scientific Mulitverse (stardate 795.633) has an article extolling the benefits of a local para-trielastic modulus. The writer is quite confident that the previous conflicts between the para-monoelastic modulus and influx glytroskinators are all but eliminated.

Hope that helps!

I read one of the source articles that he used to write his article. He didn't mention that this only helps above sea level. Below sea level, e.g. Death Valley, the Dead Sea, or under the ocean there is no improvement over the monoelastic type. Also, over 9000 feet the para-trielastic modulus can cause an explosion if benzene is used as a catalyst for the secondary barfometric stage; this is why they are not used on aircraft.